I've heard them in two seperate systems. In fact beside Magnepan 3.6's. They couldn't even begin to stack up against the Maggies. Too many claims are made in reference that their superior products ( several out there ) can compete and beat others costing 2,3,4, ..... times as much. If your own ears believe it then that's ALL that matters! I'm not one of those. JMHO
Emerald Physics: Same as the Quads in the fifties?
Let me premise that I've never listened to Emerald Physics speakers. But I have been reading lots of audiogoners' opinions on them. Based on what I've read, I would conclude that we have some sort of revolutionary product here, something that can be compared to Quads ESL57 when they came out in 1957. What do you guys think? That is, it looks like we have: a) a new technology; and b) a sub-$10K product (the CS.1) that is superior to products that cost 5 times as much...and a sub-$4K speaker (the CS.2) that performs better than most speakers in the $10K to 20K range.
Do you think the analogy is appropriate?
Do you think the analogy is appropriate?