I guess my post wasn’t clearly stated. It was not meant to be about whether SACD players can do good redbook. They obviously can, although some designers, Audio Note among them, believe that multi-function transports cannot extract as much from redbook than a dedicated CDs transport. Be that as it may. What I was asking was whether the “air” that people seem to consistently attribute to high rez, is actually ultrasonic digital aliasing creeping into the audible range. Given my past experiences with digital sampling, I found that people sometimes preferred having a bit of noise mixed in on top of the music. I don’t expect anyone to have a definitive answer, but it seemed interesting after seeing the amount of ultrasonic energy present in DSD recordings.
DSD and aliasing?
I gave up on SACD a long time ago, mostly because the multi-format players I owned (Esoteric X5, Sony 9000 & 5400) didn’t do that well with redbook imo. The proponents of SACD and high rez seem to all say the same thing - that high rez has more “air” and I was wondering if this was actually due to aliasing. Audio science review and I believe Goldensound both measured high rez and the measurements showed a large amount of ultrasonic energy in the music, well above what appears to be the audible range. I was very involved in synthesizer and drum sampling and programming in the early 80s. I recall that I, as well as the people I was working for, often preferred the sample sounds without the anti-aliasing filters because of the shimmer it seemed to put on the samples. Much like tape hiss. When we would mix the 24 track down to 15 ips 2 track, the subtle layer of hiss actually improved the sound in some ways. It seems people like some noise mixed in with their music. So I wonder if the alleged “air” in SACD is actually a small amount of ultrasonic aliasing reaching down into the audible range, if that’s even possible.