Done buying new vinyl


Just bought a few albums recommended by a mag. Party by Aldous Harding and Beautiful Jazz by Christian Jacobs. The first has that slight buzzing distortion and dirty noise in one channel for the entire recording. The second has a two small clicks every revolution thru most of a side. The recording quality of the first varies from song to song. From very good to fair. But mostly dull with processing. The second is an AAA recording and is fair at best. Recorded too low and too muffled with flattened soundstage and dynamics. I have hundreds of 60s jazz and blues records that trounce these.
Should I send them back to Amazon?

128x128noromance

lots of really good advice and thoughts re: vinyl in this discussion

FWIW I've been a vinyl 'aficionado' since about 1968 (and boy do I wish I hadn't sold all those albums while 4 years in college !).  Late to the party, but recently have been filling voids in my collection via Discogs which I've found to be an outstanding source of vinyl I've coveted.  Discogs is also a great resource when it comes to learning about all the issues and reissues of various recordings.  I've tried to stick with sellers whose ratings are 99.5% and higher; so far so good!  I've had good luck and bad luck buying some of the new 180 gram vinyl; my assumption that, given the cost of new records, they would necessarily be equal to or better than original records has proven to be an incorrect assumption.  Some are very good, some very bad, and some have been so warped or unlistenable, they just go back.  Whatever you buy, I'd recommend you make sure you can return it for full purchase price.  Partly because I've found that the original recording usually sounds best and partly because I like the idea of owning an 'original' vs. a reissue, I try to buy the original.  Several labels have been discussed above; in my experience original Warner Bros (green label) and original Verve labels usually sound outstanding, depending of course on the record's condition.  Won't bother with VG or VG+, it's either M or NM when it comes to sellers' descriptions.  Yes, they can be expensive, no doubt.  But so are guns, cars, motorcycles, boats, houses, fancy restaurants, fly rods, travel trailers, and vacations abroad.  Factor in inflation, though, and factor in what a seriously good vinyl rig can cost, 'expensive' then becomes relative. Cared for properly, records should last several lifetimes.  Knowing a recording is original AND sounds really good and I don't choke on the cost, provided it's not just crazy high.  (Van Morrison Astral Weeks on WB original green label for $443 plus shipping?  Uh, not going there......).  Proper cleaning, handling, storage, and a TT/cartridge/tonearm set up properly will protect the investment indefinitely.      

Great thread!  Yes, do us all a favor and send the lousy sounding records back with a note that they sound like crap. $25, $30, $50, $65 whatever for new pressings should definitely sound better than a $13 CD.

The pressings of new releases I have acquired most recently have been good to very good.  Repressings have been excellent (50th anniversary edition of Herbie Hancock's Maiden Voyage on green vinyl from Blue Note) to at least decent sounding, even 180g reissues of 70 rock albums that were randomly splayed across a shelf at Fred Meyer. Lucky I guess.

I agree with all that has been said about an industry that has been rescued from the dust bin and is shaking off the rust.  But even my old albums from the 60s, 70s and 80s (and my dads albums from the 50s) had “texture” in quality certainly between records, and between examples of the same recording.  Everyone has had one or two ablums with sound quality that ran circles around the rest of your vinyl.  And others that were meh at best.  I guess this is why people pay mad money for hot stampers.

I have the luxury of buying used records at several shops that afford the ability to listen before you buy, so all factors from mastering to record care history are exposed.  I often end up buying something unexpected, and maybe paying a premium for it, just because it sounds so good even through the very rudimentary gear available.  Again, lucky.
@wesheadly,

You took several paragraphs to explain what I thought I previously said in one sentence!
What's your point?
slaw: I suppose I felt that that your zen-like simplicity ;~) deserved some further elaboration. Especially for anyone just getting into vinyl.