Regardless of input used on dac, I2S clock and power supply to that clock is the last clock seen prior to analog conversion. One is just adding more clocks using other inputs, how these clocks interact with I2S dac internal clock is variable. Employing highest quality clocks and power supply to those clocks throughout entire streaming chain extremely important for presentation. Presentation means timing, getting timing right means more analog like presentation. High end vinyl setups are the reference for this, listen to this and you'll get an idea of goal to reach for.
Does your DAC sound better through the S/PDIF or I2S inputs than through USB?
For a long time I used a Windows NUC driving my DAC through USB. (A modified Gustard X20Pro.) Then I got an Aurender N100 which provided a better USB source. I also tried a DAC on the recommendation of a friend in the New Jersey Audiophile Society. People were excited about this there: the Gustard R26.
I found that the R26 is disappointing through its USB input, but excels through the Coax S/PDIF input using a Gustard U18 Digital/Digital Convertor.
This probably points to a subpar USB implementation, to be honest, but I started wondering if this is a general pattern among DACs that can take both S/PDIF and USB.
Anyone find something similar in their DAC?
For example, I'm interested in a Schiit DAC (not sure which model yet). Now that I have the DDC I can drive it through Coax and compare to USB. With the Gungnir 2, I may not have the choice of USB because they have a USB C connection and my only good USB cable is A to B.
Note: what is wrong with the R26 through the USB input: very light bass, unintegrated treble (sibilance kind of clouds over the sound and doesn't integrate with the body of the instruments)
- ...
- 28 posts total
- 28 posts total