Does upgrading you system have to be on a logarithmic curve?


Has anyone else noticed that the higher you go in sonic quality the more it cost to get an incremental increase in sonic quality. For example if you buy a 300 stereo from Walmart it sounds ok then you go a spend 3000 on one and the jump in sound quality is huge. Now to get the same percentage jump in sound quality you need to spend 9000 then 30000. So I am at the 30k+ threshold what do you have to spend to get the same incremental jump. This is more of a rhetorical question has anyone else experienced this.   

wmorrow

Showing 1 response by mahler123

My system  runs about $40K, so I can’t comment about benefits that might accrue if I went into the level that some here have.  I do know that at my level any change that I make tends to be a lateral move.  At first the new component sounds like an improvement, but eventually I realize that it is just doing something in a different way, and I start to miss what has been lost with the change.  I suspect that I would have to leap into a bracket that I just don’t want to ascend into.

  I suspect the logarithmic view applies more to digital.  My bias is that well built digital is so good that not much more can be obtained by pumping more money into the source.  Analog however might repay greater expenditures, as more resources translate into overcoming the limitations of analog.  Overbuilt massive  turntables are bettor at suppressing vibrations for example.