Do you prefer tall speakers


I have had the distinct pleasure of listening to my DCM Time Frame 2000s sn 446/447 for 6 years.  As the pair was made in 1988 a component failure is a certainty at some point.  As I am accustomed to the always stunning sounds they make (and on a budget) I started looking for suitable replacements.  Any repairs on the 2000s would be made but the speakers are complicated and cannot be rushed.

Enter the Von Schweikert VR4 Gen 2s.  The pair had languished on a site for 6 months  at 1025.  Quite heavy for shipping but I live within a couple hours of   the sellers town.  An exceptionally nice and trusting man named Sam took a 100 down.  He was returning  to England and decided to let me me PP him the rest as I could.  Sam even brought them to my house as he "was in the area why not".  Thank you Sam!

I hooked them up to my Proceed HPA-2 which plays perfectly with my 2000s.  A little bright at first but fabulous sound as reviews promised!  It took a couple of days to realize what was so different.  I was looking down at the soundstage, not up at normal real height for singers and such.  I have always considered the long array of drivers at the top of the TFs to be a huge part of their appeal sonically.  The soundstage has height, up at eye level.  I have attached the TF manual pic as the driver array is so unconventional.

As the VRs are backup and looking for a different amp I have taken them to my local cannabis dispensary to share them with my friends and customers there.  Such fine speakers should be heard and seen.  I had a Audionics CC-2 amp (check them out) and got the owner to purchase a Rockville PPA53 pre for its BT .  Sounds pretty good!  I'm looking at a Hafler 9500 Trans Nova if any one has experience with one.

A common lament on these sites is the death of hi end audio as many people don't know that they are missing.  I aim to change that a little.  Great music should be shared!

Your thoughts please...

 

guscreek

Showing 4 responses by guscreek

sls883 Hi yes I played with the rear tweeter.  Biggest factor is recalibrating my brain for the new sound I think.  Lucky son!  Hopefully it will introduce his young friends to real audio.

fastfreight  My last home allowed me to crank my 2000s past the point of local listenability while I did things else where.  I loved to set those monsters free and Revel (yes) in the sheer dynamics of the sound.

@meadowman 

I agree with your assessment of the 2000s.  It's always nice to hear(yes) another opinion on them as they are so rare.  I will never sell mine for sure!  It's like they are full of an infinite amount of butterflies that flap in concert (can't help myself..) to produce the thunderous lows, wonder mids and exquisite highs.

@harleyujoe Definitely considering stands for the VR4s.  Have some very crafty friends I can enlist to do them justice.  Still trying to come up with a great amp in my budget.  Looking at the Hafler 9500 and NAD 2600.  Love to have a Halcro DM-38 on looks alone, never mind performance.  Coolest looking amp EVER. One here on CL but one 0 out of my price range ;)

@audiokinesis 

Hi no you are correct but even having a woofer at the top of the array seems to add even further to the tall soundstage.  Wave guide tweeter on 2000s 42" up.    Until I put the VRs on stands it is probably not a fair comparison.  Surprised the thread is still active.

@swede58 Yes as I am discovering.  I really think a top woofer lends a sound I prefer.