Do vacuum tube test values reflect sound quality?

I have pondered this myself, but I really don’t have a clue.  My only  experience has been that there’s a noticeable difference between mismatched tubes. 

I kinda wish I could have bought a tube tester 40-50 years ago. 
 

@sls883
Brother I hate tubes like I hated that girl in high school that I could never stay away from. I know they are wrong for me but they are so good. 
I bought some hybrid tube amps BHK 300s  which have a tube front end that makes sense to me but still there is the inevitable degradation that happens with tubes even if they test perfectly. It's like the frog in the pan of water it can't tell how hot it is before it boils. 

In a well designed circuit, tubes will last quite a long time, certainly many years, sometimes more than a decade. One of the few good uses for a tube tester (and I specify a tester that measures transconductance in units rather than as “good” or “bad”) is to record the values for Gm when new and then retest the tubes periodically if you want to ameliorate your anxieties about tube aging. Hickok made the best testers and they all can measure Gm, for example. Should one prefer SS because of tubes aging? With SS you get sudden total failures where the discrete transistor or integrated circuit that failed is no longer available. Nor is there anyone left with expertise to do the repair. With tubes you just plug in a new one.

Tubes like the 12AX7, used by many companies as a cathode follower, are not a good choice. They do it because there are billions of 12AX7s in the world

Many did it because the high µ was needed and the other half of the tube was right there without a good use so it was turned into a CF to buffer the high Rp that comes part and parcel with the high µ.

The marantz 7C uses three AX7s per channel.  4 sections are used for gain and two are cathode followers.  It would be a mess if a more suitable tube were used for the CFs

dave

"A mess" meaning there would have to be at least one or two more tubes, preferably of high transconductance to use as CFs. But could you then delete one of the 12AX7s and end up with the same number of tubes?

While I recognize the importance of the 7C in audio history and its high sonic quality for its day (and its collector value), I don't think it measures up well against any. of the best phonolinepreamps of the past 25 years purely in terms of sound quality.  Not that I can prove that the 12AX7 it uses as a CF is an audible weak link. More likely the power supply and parts quality hold it back, in the sense that we have much better capacitors and resistors of all kinds available these days. Also, the one and only time I ever saw a schematic, it seemed overly complex, but I cannot recall specifics.