Do speakers need to be re-broken in?


Just purchased a set of speakers which have sat for quite while- 5 years from what I am told. I have heard the differences between new "tight" speakers drivers and a broken in pair, where the bass gets deeper and the speaker "breathes" better and sounds more open, and clear and resolves better, you know- just sounds better all-around.

I haven’t witnessed this personally in my own home in over a decade, and that was with planar drivers and not conventional cones, which this set has, but regardless of speaker technology I believe it is well understood this is a necessary process and manufacturers agree and suggest this- so not looking for any arguments there please.

But I would think used, or already broken in speakers would not do go through this process, but my ears are telling me they are getting better, so contrary to my assumption perhaps they do need re-breaking in? Anyone else gone through this?

mclinnguy

Showing 7 responses by mclinnguy

Thanks for the responses so far. I was considering being one of those OP’ers who start a thread and then you never ever hear from them, until their next thread- but I am not that type of person. wink

I recently purchased a pair of AER BD-3 drivers and was told it could take over 100 hours for the paper cones to loosen up and settle in.

Again, new driver break is not being debated here, that has basically been concluded to be required by manufacturers, and most of our ears have accepted this to be a fact as well.

The speakers I have in question have Lowther drivers which from the Lowther USA rep require 300 hours of break in.

And yes of course my ears are being adjusted to the new speakers and their different presentation, and I am still playing around with setup positioning, and getting over a cold where one ear was plugged is also a definite factor.

My question was after 1000 hours of playing, then sitting for 5 years, should they require additional "loosening"? I am going to come to the conclusion of a "few hours", as some have suggested, not to mention the single capacitor between the Lowther and the tweeter may require a little juice to restabilize seems plausable as others have suggested.

 

Then, a few years later, I came into possession of that same pair of LCD-3s, which had not been used in over 6 months by their current owner. The fat bass was back and when compared to my LCD-XCs, was exactly the way I’d remembered it. I literally could not listen to them playing most music.

But after another week of break-in and the two units sounded pretty similar again in the lower registers.

To sum it up: Audeze planar magnetics, at least the models I owned, undoubtedly require break-in in order to be listenable. Furthermore, leaving them unused (at least the LCD-3) for a long time created the need for another break-in period.

Aha!, thanks for sharing @cundare2 

@jl35

Yes, I have. I am pleased to report there have been huge changes. I was going to wait another couple of days to post this, but since you asked....

Surprisingly they have changed so much I question as to whether they were ever used. But I know that they were, for many years. The date on one of the woofers is from 2011.

Full story:

I saw these speakers for sale, I wondered what the heck are these? I looked them up, researched them, read everything I could find about them, which honestly wasn’t very much, half of it was from the good people here on Audiogon, and came to the conclusion this might be a good deal, and being a nutty audiophile why not get a second set of decent speakers. I decided to buy them unheard personally but based on the many glowing and positive impressions. I got them home, set them up in my system on Saturday Nov 18 and started playing music. And I listened and thought to myself, this is it? These are these speakers that I have read so many good things about, speakers that have been praised at shows as having "best of show" sound?

I played around with setup, I knew with 8 woofers they had prodigious bass, and was prepared to put them in a different room than this one I have now if it didn’t work. I did hear that huge bass output when placed near the manufacturers suggested position near the front wall so I pulled them well out which tamed the bass, bass was good, but something was off; not right. The treble sounded very laid back, too relaxed, like 40th row in a 40 row theatre. Some tracks sounded like someone threw not sheets, not towels, but sleeping bags over the midrange drivers and tweeters. Well hell, something doesn’t add up. I read these were "musical" speakers, well okay, but this is much flatter than "musical". I have owned Mcintosh amps from the 80’s, which were "musical", meaning the resolution wasn’t great, but something sounds darn right broken here. I checked the mids, I checked the tweeter, yes sound is being emitted from them. Perhaps they were stored outdoors and the tweeters froze to death? I listened for 2 days more swapping some of the cables I have, again playing with positioning, toe out, toe in, thinking they were a little better, I heard some detail that was promising, but still far from adequate, so different from track to track, and scratching my head in puzzlement I seriously did not think they required any major breaking in, but perhaps they would get a little bit better with use? Wondered if anyone else has been through this with a used set of speakers. I then posted this question 2 days later Nov 18.

I then wondered if it was perhaps an amp/speaker mismatch? Maybe these speakers don’t work so well with a solid state amp? So I ordered the amp that most use with these speakers, the amp they were voiced with from the manufacturer and the amp typically used at the shows they were in: a 300b tube amp.

Most answers here were along the lines of what I expected- maybe a little break-in, but not much. Definitely not like a new set. I kept listening and playing them 8-10 hours a day, and some tracks I heard their potential, but most treble still was so inferior to the Magneplanar’s they replaced; at least from 100hz and up- they still however produced wonderful bass below 100hz, and what was output below 40hz was beyond what my maggies can’t even imagine to reproduce. But this was expected. The complete lack of treble, air, and openness was not expected. I thought I made a huge mistake. Maybe the tube amp will correct the issue. Maybe something is broken inside? But there is no crossover to speak of- just a single capacitor.

Well flip ahead to Friday, 6 days later, or about 50-70 hours of playing time, and it was like someone flipped a switch- they are a completely different set of speakers. It wasn’t even gradual, it was like "Bam, here is your treble!" It is now 9 days since I put them in the system and I am now understanding the accolades and best of show reports- they are sounding phenomenal. I have the detail, realistic voices, gobs of pitch and definition but still a relaxed and "musical" presentation they were reported to have. I can’t express enough my delight!

Skeptics: Believe me I considered all other variables- I have a science degree. It was not anything else, I switched back the same cables that were in place on the first day, no other changes were made. And no, psychology and physiology majors it is not an "adjustment period", I am not that weak-minded, and the cold I had and am still getting over? Okay, although I am willing to admit my hearing wasn’t 100%, but hey- my wifes voice didn’t sound overly muffled last week compared to this week- she still sounded the same then as she does now. But the voices from these speakers sure don’t. In the past I have gone through some cable swaps I would admit may be a 1% difference, and I had to go back and forth a dozen times to hear the difference- I would argue the head cold and "adjustment period" are on this level. Whereas the sound I am getting from last week to this week is more like 60% by comparison. Additionally my 25 year old daughter also confirmed this. She was here last Sunday and heard them, then came back yesterday 6 days later and played the same music and agreed it is a night and day difference. "They sound so much more complete". Yes, I now hear the highs to match the lows. smiley

So yes, to answer my own question these speakers need to be re-broken in. I can’t speak to any other speaker, I don’t know why or how, but these speakers with their Lowther midranges required many hours of playing to sound decent after a lengthy hibernation. Maybe it is just a Lowther "thing". But a few other posters above explained the same experience. Perhaps they will get even better in the next few weeks after the manufacturers suggested 300 hours of break-in for a new pair? They sound pretty damn good now, but who knows!

The speakers are Horning Eufrodites.

@arafiq Good to hear. I never wanted to try subs with mine, I was happy for 15 years without them, but I'll admit if I went from these Horning's and then tried the Maggies I would definitely think something was missing- you know, all the stuff below 40hz, which is probably what your ears are telling you after all the other wonderful speakers you have had and still own. 

You already have your own thread for your maggie experiment so don't post it here but update what you got over there. yes

 

@arafiq

No worries! No apologies for any hi-jacking necessary! I am just wanting those who have been reading your Magneplanar adventures to be able to get all the information there and not miss anything.

Actually I think that thread you started would be more appropriate for a maggie/horning comparison than this one. 

@arafiq 

I was wondering also if when you demoed these Eufrodites if they were well broken in? Because you stated you thought the treble was a little rolled off if I recall correctly. 

@ghdprentice

Interesting speakers... I really like the way all the woofers are hidden.

Yes, they are part horns, part dipoles, maybe part transmission line? I am no expert in the matter of speaker design or definitions, but yes they are quite the design. I am totally new to them too of course, but some here have been enjoying these speakers for almost 20 years? The advantage of multiple woofers moving 1mm instead of one woofer moving 20mm is easy to comprehend- it is the similar principle to a planar magnetic speaker- and what I don’t want is a lack of speed and some slow and plodding bass. The bass from these is powerful yet fast and tight.

Also, interesting how additional time was required. I have experienced this with cables... so, I guess it make sense it would also happen with speakers.

Yes, me too. I am now a believer and also experienced the "system sounds better after resting for several days" phenomenon, as many have claimed to be a "thing" for many years. This is beyond breaking in and seasoning of components of course.

This is what @gramophone_canada alluded to above, and what I have read from others also who attended audio shows, that systems always seemed to sound best on the last day compared to the first where nothing was touched and all equipment has been well broken in previous to the setup at the show.

Beyond cables liking to rest and the dielectric to "relax" over a few days, the Live Vibe platforms I use definitely sound better after gravity has had their effect on the components resting on them after several days. The couplers dig their way into the carpet and the resonances have found a more efficient way to the larger mass. At least that is my understanding of what is going on. Don’t care the reason, my ears tell me something is going on for the better

I still wonder though, as far as these speakers are concerned, is this the paper cone relaxing, the foam getting less stiff, the wiring/dielectric on the wiring in the speaker doing the same as any other new cabling, or is it the magnetics re-aligning or re-conditioning? All of the above? No idea.