Do speaker cables need a burn in period?

Hello, Kitty!

You Must Be watching your own clock. I suggest you stop drinking your own koolaid and the ideations will resolve. 

💩🐍🙀👮‍♂️🔚

Or the clock they use. 🕰🐍💩🙀🚽🔚

No, tell me.

As I recall, you may have missed large parts of the thread. As I recall, another earlier appeared to have felt threatened, too. 👮‍♂️

Clearly, he has stated his INTENT to do something. Remember, Kitty, you injected yourself into all this and at the very least you are a voluntary public figure, voluntarily participating in an open debate.

In any event, you best clear up your statement of intent. 🐈

What does “meh” mean?

if it means you are indifferent, just remember it is not your ox being gored. 

“What well established scientific norms are you talking about? I certainly hope nobody broke any scientific laws. Because if anyone broke Ohm’s law I say we hang him.”

What?🙀

Abjure not Galileo!  🐍💩

Occam’s razor, applied to Jeff’s Kat = ?

The Articles of Conspiracy were drafted by....

🙀🚽

Therefore Jeff’s Kat is....🐍💩

Pyramiding assumptions yields nothing but speculation and a pyramid of.....  💸🗑🚽🐈

Meeeow!  🙀

What is the flash point of snake oil?  Does it correlate with “burn in?”

Wha, wha, what?  🤔🔌🐈🐍💩

Bishop Berkeley begs to disagree. 👀

Query: if a cable is being burned in, deep in the forest with no one to hear it, does its sound change?

Col Solare for me. 👍🔚

Francis, is that you?  Is Jeff’s Kat channeling, again?  🐍💩🙀👻

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7KPX8-bTOr8

Allegory. 🤔🐍💩

I’ll vouch for the Darwins, and being 1/2 Irish I’ll gladly fight over it. 👀

Telegraph wires!  Man, Jeff’s Kat can salvage and resell them!  And, surely old transatlantic cable would sound even better at $10,000 an inch!  🐈💸💋😱

“One hour of serious abuse is enough to get their character.”

Lost in translation?  Wrong forum?  🙀😱🤔👀🔚

And, then, the falsity of a motive denied....

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.
I have come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.  🐍💩

Indian burn....😱🌋

Ipse dixit. 🐍💩🗑🐈

🐍💩🐈🕰🚽

Meeee, ooow!

Ha ha🐍💩

I guess ole Kitty Kat has piddled on so many legs he confused the sensation.

Yes, Kitty, I did drive a high altitude, 500 knot bus, and later represented shipowners.

Yes, Kitty, I do love peaches and hamburgers.

Yes, Kitty, it is psuedoscience.

No, Kitty, this is not your litter box. Yours is in that gunny sack, with the bricks....
🐍💩💸🐈

And, others gag, or induce the same. Meeeooow!  🐍💩🐈

If people never asked for proof of scientific hypotheses we’d have gotten nowhere. 

Yes, a rat’s ass. 🐍💩👀🚽🕰

I think you mistake us, and generalize. I opine cables do make a difference, but have only experience to support it, and believe the differences usually de minimis. That said, I flat out don’t believe in Kitty Kat’s many, sui generis contentions. Now, where’d I put that gunny sack....🐈🔚😱

Ah, in Plato’s Cave, you are but a flickering shadow. Would that it be so, here.

Yes, I drove a 500 knot bus.

Yes, I like peaches and hamburgers.

Ah, my gunny sack...here, Kitty....🐈🔚😱

Oddly, the Cardas article, written by one with an implied pecuniary interest, cites no authority. It is 100 per cent bootstrap. I guess it is time for hamburgers and peaches while making an ILS approach in the old bus. 🐍💩🐈🚽🔚

Ha, ha! Iron Mike is great. Cockpit acoustics are top notch, but you’d know that if you flew up front with the big dogs. 🐍💩🐈💩🚽🔚

But, the cheap seats will get you there. Do you have one of those little donuts, Kitty?

There are asteroids around Uranus. 🙀

Off to the chronosynclastic infundibulum, Kitty Kat.....🐈💩🚽🔚

🐈💩😒

Nothing stinks like 🐈💩.

🐈💩🗑

Peaches and hamburgers!

A syllogism, please, as the accepted form of logical argument, rather than ad hominems. 

🐈💩

Well, little dudes, it depends on whether you are in federal or state court, and if state court, whether the forum applies Frye or Daubert. I opine this notion would not be admissible under either test, and a motion in limine granted. 

Nothing more disgusting than the smell of Kat 💩 in the morning. 

Fine, frame a syllogism that rationally supports your views, free from rancor or sophistry. We shall go from there. 🐈💩

Andy, May we have your syllogism, please?

Ha, ha!

Enter a word, e.g. "pie"syl·lo·gism/ˈsiləˌjizəm/noun

1. an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).
   • deductive reasoning as distinct from induction."logic is rules or syllogism"

Might we have a syllogism, please?  You know, something like all Greeks are men....


🐈💩

Major premise: all clowns are asses. 

Minor premise: there is a surfeit of clowns, here. 

Conclusion: ?

🐈💩🤡💩👀😱

🐈💩😱

The problem is the non believers are non-technical people and non-honorable people. They use the word "honor" as a tool but they themselves don’t actually know the meaning of the word since it’s entirely foreign to them. Like a blind from berth will never knows the concept of color.

Huh? Gotta watch them homonyms. 🐈💩🐍🐈😱

Oh, you should watch those class-based generalizations. In logic and in law, such is regarded as arbitrary, capricious, irrational and illogical. 

Arf, arf. 😁. Your syllogism, please.

oh, the homonym thing. Don’t ask, don’t tell. 🐈💩👀😘

Already sold, long ago. 🐈💩

Well, get the crap out of your ears, Kitty. 

🐈💩🙀