For example, if an inferior system is too bright, a cable can affect the tonality and, sometimes, improve it
Which justifies spending $2/foot not 0.50 for bulk wire.
Do no harm to a signal! Does this mean.....
No. Ask anyone who is making that claim, to quantify the claim. It is best to step back to avoid the flailing hand waving at this point. "Trust your ears" never means "Trust your ears". It usually means, use your ears, but trust your eyes. Almost as a rule, anyone who makes the statement, "Trust your ears", never trusts their own ears. That is why they never blind test. Virtually every claim made by a cable manufacturer about what their cable does is easily proven with current measurement technology. Ask yourself why they never do. |
Obviously no comment is needed. Let’s just leave this here for posterity. This comment proves my point better than I ever could have on my own. |
Yes really. You want an IC to roll off the highs, you increase capacitance by putting the conductors closer together. You want speaker cables to roll off the highs, you increase inductance by spacing out the conductors. There is no magic. However, doing either is highly system dependent, and almost always if you take your eyes out of the equation, not audible. Some like Transparent add some cheap passive components to the cable. Some claim that adding a bias reduces noise (though the opposite happens). Some make claims about ground blocks, but can't seem to prove it. |