2. cables
  3. 166352-155632

Do no harm to a signal! Does this mean.....

So basic cables are harming the precious delicate analogue signal as it approaches a speaker.  

and how to avoid?  
Isnt this the reason for paying up for cables cause,its so hard to limit signal damage? Not about improving signal. So much damage going on.  

never dreamed how much i was harming the signal.  Does all this make sense???


jumia

Showing 2 responses by allenf1963

allenf1963
378 posts
 
Wow!  This has to be an Audiogon first.  If anyone knows of another instance, please let me know ASAP. 

Can you believe, there has actually been a "discussion thread devolved into a name calling argument" over the pros and cons and perceived auditory merits of spending up to $20,000 for a 6-foot piece of wire, WITHOUT Chuck Miller chiming in with his "$2,000 worth opinion" (Chuck has NEVER only given 2-Cents worth) AND WITHOUT seeing Ted Denney or Synergistic Research mentioned.

Utterly amazing.
allenf1963
378 posts
 
@russ69 -- My point exactly....

"...BTW it’s cable not wire... Words Count..."

That would depend on the construction of the "cable". A pair of un-wound wires or ribbons would not be cables.

More to discover