Ah, now I get it. Thank you.
|
|
"jasonbourne71 appears to be a hideous, miserable deaf person in his late 90s, whose only role in life is ruining things for others. It makes me angry every time I read one of his posts, and I sincerely wish he would just go away."
Or, you might try not reading his posts.
|
"It’s also great for paranormal investigations, detecting EMF changes linked to ghostly activity."
Wonder if it can detect the Ghost of Christmas Past...
|
"Many on here would be better to be happy with what they have and quit trying to belittle people..."
Right back at ya...
|
Empiricism, subjectivism, objectivism, et al are interesting classifications of thought but no matter what label you put on one’s way of thinking, they all distill down to individual sensory perception. It can’t be any other way. It’s all sensory input. I’m gonna call it Sensorial Perceptionism. Fancy! Feel free to spread it around or, you know, not. Either way, my senses won’t perceive any hard feelings. Or will they...? Beats me, I put on two different shoes this morning.
|
Doesn't amperage play a part in this? I also don't see the correlation between changing the power source with changing the power cord.
|
@retiredfarmer ,
You understand completely??!🤔😆
I’m terribly sorry, you seem to have me confused with someone who gives people like you more than a passing thought. I do not.
I trust this clears up any confusion you may have in the future.
|
@richardbrand ,
Looking forward to the results of your experiment.
|
@grunge1000 ,
A good question not likely to receive a satisfactory answer for you.
But, we hear what we hear. Who are we to judge either those who hear a difference or those who don't. Both are right. Those who hear a difference flat out hear a difference no matter the reason. I find it silly when those who don't hear a difference post that people who do are wrong, like they know better than the person who is actually experiencing it. Whether it's due to some as yet undiscovered scientific explanation or individual perceptual reality bias, we hear what we hear.
We've known how to utilize electricity for our purposes for a long time, yet it's still not truly understood how in its most basic constituents all that voodoo works.
|
Even the ultra-low frequency submarine communications base has been dismantled.
Perhaps not permanently...🤔
|
Nothing wrong with that!
Bet it sounds quite good.
|
@grunge1000 ,
I have a single Bluetooth speaker running through my phone.
Methinks you are pulling our collective leg and you in fact have a nice sounding system...
|
They all taste like a chemical spill in a smoldering peat bog...and yes I’ve had higher end scotches.
|
Now wine coolers, there’s a difference!
You know, for those with a sophisticated palate...
|
"The guy who organised the whisky tastings was very quietly spoken..."
That is a sure way of identifying either the smartest or most dangerous person in a room. Or both...
|
"I am old enough to remember when blending whiskies indeed was banned."
Widespread whisky blending was permitted starting in 1860.
Exactly how old are you??!
|
@mclinnguy ,
Just checked out your system, beautifully done.
Also happy you survived the Great Potato Famine. Kids the last couple of centuries don’t know how good they have it..!
|
@richardbrand ,
What in your opinion is the best type copper for cable application?
|
There you go again, clouding the issue with facts!
|
@audphile1 ,
As to your question; Everything @grunge1000 posted is a fact. I don't think he's lying, do you? Does any of his experiment and results pertain to audio in any way? Beats me. He even stated as much himself. I've stated through the years many, many times that I would never presume to tell anyone what they hear or don't hear. I don't believe @grunge1000 ever stated as much either. My slant is he, being of a scientific mind, is simply looking for the 'why' are people hearing what they say they are hearing. Did his experiment prove anything conclusively either way? Again, beats me. But, the conclusion of his experiment is a fact, and this subject, being that it boils down to personal perception, is indeed a cloudy one.
|
It's still a fact whether it pertains to audio or not.
It may not be perceived as relevant, but that doesn't change its status.
Don't read too much into my simple statement because it doesn't warrant in-depth scrutiny. It's just a simple statement that doesn't lean to any side.
|
