2. home-theater
  3. 1093747707

DLP vs Plasma/LCD

I was just about ready to plunk down $4k for a Panasonic 42" plasma. I was at my brother's tonight watching the Olympics on his 42" Pioneer plasma (HD transmission,) when he tells me that I should go with a DLP for my bedroom, rather than the plasma. He claims the picture is much better and they cost less. I wasn't even considering a DLP because I didn't think it would fit in my bedroom. (being to deep) He says they make some, now, that are only a few inches deeper/wider than a plasma. Any takers? Is the DLP the way to go? If so, can anyone recommend one with killer picture quality, and relatively thin? thanks in advance. warren
warrenh

Showing 3 responses by kr4

kr4's avatar
kr4
3,720 posts
 
Here's my 2cents about the relative drawbacks:

1. DirectView CRT or RP, of any sort, are too bulky and get the way of the audio.

2. Large screen LCD (>42") is too expensive.

3. FP requires the room to be dimmed for even casual viewing.

4. Plasma is expensive and has a limited life (although I am not concerned about leakage). However, the life span with my general usage pattern will excede my needs and the unit will be obsolete before it fails (a statistical projection, not a guarantee).

Went with the plasma. Very happy audiophile.

Kal
kr4's avatar
kr4
3,720 posts
 
The 42" commercial Panasonic seems the consensus favorite of the AVSforum denizens. However, Sony, NEC, Hitachi and Pioneer have growing support. The problem is that there is no easy way to see any of them set up optimally and certainly no easy way to see all of them set up optimally in the same place with the same lighting conditions as at home.

I went with the 50" Fujitsu.

Kal
kr4's avatar
kr4
3,720 posts
 
Eandylee wrote: "Kr4 and Jer mentioned replacing burbs...
I know there's buring bulb issue with plasma but DLP?"

1. I never mentioned anything about burbs (or bulbs).
2. There are no bulbs or bulb issues with plasma.

Kal
More to discover