Ken,
Yes, it can take a significant amount of time. On the other hand, if there ARE any of the ripping tools that do this automatically, they're going to have to go through the same process and will probably be slow too.
Regarding you're earlier question about Roxio: I haven't used it in a while but a lot of these tools offer the ability to do normalization on the fly. This is not the same as what you are trying to do. Normalization attempts to make all of the tracks approx. the same loudness so you don't have to keep playing with the volume every time a track changes. Dynamic range would be unaffected which is what you need compressed.
Good luck with the search.
Dick
Yes, it can take a significant amount of time. On the other hand, if there ARE any of the ripping tools that do this automatically, they're going to have to go through the same process and will probably be slow too.
Regarding you're earlier question about Roxio: I haven't used it in a while but a lot of these tools offer the ability to do normalization on the fly. This is not the same as what you are trying to do. Normalization attempts to make all of the tracks approx. the same loudness so you don't have to keep playing with the volume every time a track changes. Dynamic range would be unaffected which is what you need compressed.
Good luck with the search.
Dick