Directional wires/cables


Is there any reason to support the idea that cables, interconnects or any other kind of wiring can be considered directional? It seems that the theory is that carrying current will alter the molecular structure of the wire. I can't find anything that supports this other than in the case of extreme temperature variation. Cryo seems to be a common treatment for wire nowadays. Extreme heat would do something as well, just nothing favorable. No idea if cryo treatment works but who knows. Back to the question, can using the wires in one direction or another actually affect it's performance? Thanks for any thoughts. I do abide by the arrows when I have them. I "mostly" follow directions but I have pondered over this one every time I hook up  a pair.

billpete

@jea48 

I see you didn't bad mouth Ralph Morrison. 

Ralph Morrison What is Electronics

"If we accept the idea that fields carry energy in space, it must be true at all frequencies. That is the law. If it is true for light, it must also be true for 60Hz power and at DC. For utility power, the energy travels in the space between conductors, not in the conductors. This is not the picture presented by circuit diagrams, where energy seems to be carried by conductors. In digital circuits, the signals and energy travel in the spaces between traces or between traces and conducting surfaces.

Buildings have halls and walls. People move in the halls, not the walls. Circuits have traces and spaces. Signals and energy move in the spaces, not in the traces."

No, I could not be bothered but I will have a little crack at him now!

If it is true for light, it must also be true for 60Hz power and at DC.

Light is an example of electromagnetic radiation which can be visualised in classical physics as synchronised oscillations of electric and perpendicular magnetic fields.  In a vacuum, they travel at the speed of light.

They are reinterpreted in quantum physics as streams of photons, which are uncharged particles with zero mass when they are at rest.  Photons do not obey the Pauli exclusion principle.

In this context, 60-Hz power and DC surely refer to electricity?  60-Hz electromagnetic waves are very low frequency radio waves!  DC is not any sort of wave.

Electricity is the result of charge, and charges are carried by electrons and other particles which do obey the Pauli exclusion principle.  Similar charges strongly repel, and opposite charges strongly attract.  Richard Feynman has stated that every electron affects every other electron in our universe.

Electric currents are not a form of Electromagnetic radiation - Wikipedia.  Mr Morrison is confusing photonics and electronics (electricity in particular).  Having got that fundamentally wrong, his assertion that electrical energy is carried in the spaces between conductors is equally wrong.

His speciality seems to be circuit board layout for digital circuits.  His message is to beware of interference between adjacent traces, especially in multi-layered applications.  This is good advice, not because of electromagnetic radiation, but because every electron interacts with every other electron.  (Photons are much better behaved!).

In digital circuits, the signals and energy travel in the spaces between traces or between traces and conducting surfaces

Surely traces are conducting surfaces?

The circuit board traces are the conductive halls filled with crowds of free electrons.

Finally, digital circuits typically operate at or near Gigahertz switching rates.  The skin effect is very important at these rates.  Almost always the switching is done in integrated circuits based on doped semi-conductors, not conducting metals.  The quantum properties of the electron turn this subject from electrics into electronics, often at the nano-scale.

If Mr Morrison believes in his "law" he should change his title to "What is photonics"

Post removed 

Or think of a long train (our record in Australia is 4.5 miles long with 682 cars and 8 locomotives), The couplers between the cars are designed to have a small amount of slack so overall the train stretches when pulled and compresses when braked.  Imagine the train is stopped.  Apply power to the lead locomotive, and the coupling to the next car will stretch a bit before that car starts to move.  The process ripples down the length of the train.  After a short while, the signal that the train is moving arrives at the last car (a mile or more from the loco) though overall not one of the cars has moved more than a few yards.

                                              and:

  Richard Feynman has stated that every electron affects every other electron in our universe.

         How many times the Dunning-Kruger exemplar above has mentioned Richard Feynman and/or QED, without the first clue as to the workings of his/its basic theory, would be hilarious, were it no so pathetic.

                      Another blunder, from the land down under?

                                          Happy listening

Post removed