Direct optical out of Mac vs USB asynchronous


I seem to recall that most Mac's let you take a digital stream of sound directly out of one of the jacks (headphone?) with a special connector. This bypasses the USB connector, which is considered such a source of trouble that we seek reclocking via asynchronous devices.

Does direct digital also need reclocking?

Why don't we hear of more people using direct digital out from Macintosh vs using the USB? Have any of you tried it?
artmaltman

Showing 1 response by zd542

"I seem to recall that most Mac's let you take a digital stream of sound directly out of one of the jacks (headphone?) with a special connector."

I used the headphone/toslink connection when I used to have a Mac. Given a choice, I would probably just go USB. I didn't like the way the optical connection was set up. I remember me being on the phone arguing with apple telling them it was impossible for a headphone jack to be a toslink as well. I thought it was some kind of misprint, but I was proven wrong. You get this little adaptor and on one side of it, the toslink cable plugs in, and the other end is a mini headphone jack with a little hole at the end of it for the light to go through. When I first saw it, I couldn't stop laughing. It was a cheesy setup, but it was a pretty cleaver idea.

"Does direct digital also need reclocking?"

Not sure what you mean. USB or Optical is digital. Generally speaking, reclocking is almost always a good idea. Especially if you are using entry level equipment.