Dirac vs 8-band McIntosh EQ


Hi,

I am looking for experienced advice to help decide how best to upgrade my stereo system.

I own a Nad C658 which offers Dirac room adjustment and has a good DAC.  Considering keeping it and adding a McIntosh C2300 (no DAC) that has limited eq adjustment.  Optionally, I am considering returning the C658 and buying a McIntosh C52.

is it better to keep the C658 and use the Dirac to adjust for the room and have limited EQ, or, just have the C52 with the 8-band EQ for adjusting source material without the Dirac?

I listen to solely digital sources (Tidal, ripped CD’s in FLAC format)

What do you think?

Warmly,

bill

william2652

Showing 1 response by auxinput

Dirac is not just an extremely fine eq but it is a phase adjustment process.  It alters the phase/timing of certain frequencies on each speaker to make them time-correct at your listening position.  In my experience, it does funny things to the sound - it makes all audio sound like it's right around your ears (like wearing headphones) instead of 6-8 feet out in front of you.  I also didn't like how it treated bass.  On most Dirac devices, you can tune how much it does each frequency area and how aggresive the tuning is, but I prefer room treatments.  Many love Dirac.

On the other hand, an 8 band EQ is a VERY rough adjuster and it is most likely not going to be precise enough to handle your specific room problems.  It is a course adjustment that's better than just bass/treble knobs and it may help the lack of some frequency areas, but you are likely going to have a much more narrow problem area. lol.