Diffuser panel design - overrated?


Often wondered about all the variations you see on diffuser panels. The interlaced cut squares.  Some companies offer mathematically and scientifically designed panels that are supposed to perform extremely well. By Specifically dealing with all those individual frequencies with carefully measured elevations within the cut squares. How the heck do they do this given all the harmonics that are involved.

I mean it's just pressure amplitudes going across the room and instead of being reflected off of a flat surface they get scattered when they hit an irregular surface.  And this provides improved clarity because it reduces the intensity of reverberations.  Very similar to water being scattered when it hits underwater irregularities versus a flat wall.

So just by rearranging your bookshelf to create an uneven surface area, isn’t this achieving the same thing.  It's not rocket science.

 

jumia

Showing 4 responses by jumia

This is a cool answer, but if the diffuser is behind the speakers most of the sound is already going to the listener without going to the diffuser first.

 

People have diffuser panels on their wall, they're not very big sometimes.

 

How much surface area do you need in a 14 x 16 room for it to make a difference?

Isn't the diffuser panel competing with all the other irregular things scattered about?

Kota1

Thank you for the video link. Immediately note that this is a one plus hour video. No doubt lots of valuable info here in.

If these audio guys want to improve their flow rate of product they need to become more concise. My gosh spending an hour listening to a meandering Journey through the world of diffusion add absorption looks very exciting.

I’ll give it some time

Are these backfiring speakers? The speakers I use our front facing with no ports in the back, so with these be a good thing for diffusers in the back of the speaker?

So my encyclopedia Britannica Collection has got to go?