Dedicated NUC/Nucleaus vs shared PC (w Fiber Media Converter connected to Endpoint)


A Roon system of 2 devices includes:

- Music Server (NUC/Nucleaus/PC, etc...)

- Endpoint (SOtM, Sonore, etc..)

with Fiber Media Converter in between.

I think we all agree that a dedicated machine of NUC/Nucleaus will be better than a shared PC as a music server. But is there a big difference of sound quality if we have optical isolation between the shared PC and an endpoint ?

Here is the idea:

A shared PC creates 2 problems:

- Analog noises (from power, fan..). But most of them can be eliminated by optical isolation like Fiber Media Converter (according to Small Green Computer).

- Latency, jitter (because PC run many other tasks). But the endpoint and DAC have buffers. So all jitters before DAC can be ignored. Besides, if we don’t listen to too fast music, the issue (if happen) will not impact much.

So does a NUC really brings a difference, compared with a shared Pc connected with endpoint through FIber media converter ????

truongv0ky

Showing 1 response by carlsbad

I run my core on a dedicated NUC with ROCK installed.  I used to use another NUC as the endpoint.  I figured out that wasn't nearly good enough and now I have a streamer as an endpoint.

The guy who introduced me to Roon, out in the middle of the California desert, had his core way off in another room on another floor of his house.  the core hooks to the network, not the sound system so don't let a fan make noise in your listening room.

Jerry