I watched the video of Andrew Lissimore, CEO of Headphones.com and watched Cameron provide details about dCS' actions in response to his review of the dCS Bartok.
I'm a longtime owner of dCS products including a full Paganini stack and currently a Rossini Apex DAC and a Rossini Clock.
My impression of dCS' reaction to Cameron's review of the Bartok is that dCS has dominated the digital world for decades and are now frightened they're losing their dominant position largely due to the plethora of digital product options we have.
I've never heard of Cameron before this incident, but we need more reviewers like Cameron that have an incredible depth of knowledge re: the design and execution of audio components. Cameron's honesty and transparency is a welcome site as he was quick to post a correction to the mistake he made re: dCS use of a 10MHz clock. He corrected this in his post by stating dCS uses a Word Clock which he seems to consider is a better option.
We have far too may unqualified reviewers that get a YouTube channel and know absolutely nothing about the internals of what they're reviewing. So, let's not penalize reviewers like Cameron that are actually qualified to inform us of reasons we night be hearing things due to the design of the electronics and their relationship to the various graphs he provides.
Message to dCS. Perhaps you should consider spending less effort on legal threats and more effort on R&D.