Nearly all DVD players offered for sale now, utilize internal DACs which are capable of decoding 96 kHz sample rates without resorting to "watering-down" the data rate (Burr-Brown and AD both have devices which are capable and are priced in the $2 range in manufacturing quantities). The real problem is not the inability of these inexpensive products to accept the data, but rather their actual intrinsic performance. Inexpensive products employee inexpensive topologies and components within and therefore cannot be expected to offer high performance results. This fact limits their performance regardless of the source material's data rate or sample size. Another point worth bring up is that transporting data over any simple bi-phase marked interface (S/PDIF, AES-EBU, Toslink, ST, etc.) is a low performance technique, as it is highly susceptible to data born jitter. Heroic attempts to "reclock" the data can help, but in the end it is the interface that is flawed. If you are striving for a high performance solution, consider either a single box player built with audio performance as a consideration. If you want to use a two-box approach, then look for an improved interface. Kevin Halverson
DADs an "interim" format??
I keep seeing statements in here to the effect that the current 24/96, DVD based music format(DAD)is an "interim" format. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it, DAD formated disks can still be played on DVD-Audio machines. DADs may not be the most efficient way of stuffing a 24/96 signal onto a DVD, but it works and there is nothing in the DVD-A spec that would preclude its use. Am I all wet here or what?
6 responses Add your response