Curious to know what you guys think/like about Pink Floyd's early work


Listening through Pink Floyd's entire studio album discography these days. I mostly know their work from the 70's to 90's. I will admit, I haven't quite connected fully with their early psychedelic years from Piper to Ummagumma yet. I suppose I'm a bigger fan of their "BIG sound" that would evolve later on with David's important guitar riffs, solos, conceptual records, unique production and Waters' lyrics. Those first records honestly do not really delight me always. I'm really open to hearing thoughts, discussing factors and history of these records that could give me a more open perspective, and maybe understand the importance of these works. Why do some of you like them? Is it the history of the band forming? Starting out with Syd? Any documentaries or books that focus on the early years?
 

britt5

Showing 3 responses by fastfreight

Yes Pink Floyd’s early work is less accessible, with all the comments about Sid’’s style accurate.  But there is some great stuff.  Gems like Arnold Layne, see Emily Play,  Cymbaline  and Careful with that Axe Eugene are great examples of their early work.

Then the album Atom Heart Mother is amazing start to finish, with the first side one long concept, and excellent singles on side 2.  Meddle is a classic, also with one long concept song and great individual songs on side 1.  Who can resist Semus, the dog outside the kitchen?

Obviously their later albums are more polished and commercially accessible.  I listen to very little after  The Wall.  Animals is another album that does not get much love, but is fantastic.

if you don’t get it, you don’t get it.  Anyone want to bash Yes’ first two albums?