Conical horns whos using them and your opinion


On performance of such. I have been experimenting for 2 years with conical. I have also used most all flares and horn types about. I do feel there is something special about the conical performance. They are a pain to build and integrate due to size the ranges are narrow but they do disappear when in use image better than other flares wave guides I've used. Not sure I'm sold on it yet but seems to me a good route to explore. Wonder what other users of conical horns could add.
128x128johnk

Showing 2 responses by johnk

The correction isn't much of a issue just the narrow bandwidth necessitates multiple conicals to cover range that other flares handle. Still I find the imaging to be better the sense of loudspeaker disappearing presenting a sound field is also bettered over other types I've used.
Since using tweeters I stopped messin with eq. I can sit very near field to this set up. The beaming really isn't a issue at all. The sound is near seamless and very low in coloration. Problem is the size gets large fast my bass conical is over 8ft L. Used 10 sheets of 4x8 birch ply on the big conical. Tweeters running to 6500hz, mid conical to 500hz, mid bass conical to 90hz the bass conical below 90hz. My friends joke and call the big bass conical king conical;) Integrating the conicals took a bit of thought but I have them vertical time aligned with no direct radiation blockage from the bells. Except for the bass conical that is its where it is. Thanks for the posts.