Thanks @thod , looking forward to your impressions!
Gianluca |
My cg-10m arrived, I think it worth it, I also have another system auralic Vega g1, with the clock, the sound stage is similar now, but indeed teac have more details than Vega g1, my current setup is focal kanta n1, luxman l590 ax mark ii, I have tried different amplifier and dac to make my focal sounds the best, kanta is a good speaker, but I still find it relatively bright, so I have to find something warm to match it up, I even tried McIntosh ma5300, but it didn't work out, and luxman class A really did its job here with focal, Now I really love my current setup with teac505 and the cg-10m, I think I can stop and enjoy now
So we can say the TEAC clock CG-10M worked on the soundstage and the three-dimensionality mainly. It's the most important part of the sound indeed! Thank you and enjoy your system 😉 Gianluca |
@maxwave : I know the NT-505 is much more versatile than the Hugo TT2 but here I’m trying to figure out which one will sound better for my taste
@canibefrank : interesting point. Do you say a better external better has a limited impact on sound? Actually I don’t know because I’ve no experience with external clocks but I’ve been thinking that precision, focus and soundstage representation would have been increased in any genre of music. Was I wrong?
Gianluca |
@canibefrank : thank you, I didn’t notice the stock NT-505 even has a dual clock for 44.1 and 48KHz frequencies. I can now get the point that the external TEAC CG-10M Master Clock could just add super-fine details.
I wanted to know your opinions about Hugo TT2 vs NT-505, but it’s clear the TEAC is the box to beat and at a fraction of the price of the Chord!
Thank you, Gianluca |
You have to put yourself in a position where you can hear it, know how to hear it and want to hear it 😉
Thanks for your report!
Gianluca
|