CD transport vs.streaming


Many have stated on this forum that the SQ from their CDs is superior to the sound from streaming sources. Others have said the opposite. Weirdly, in side by side identical tracks the sound from my Cyrus CDt sounds identical to my Cambridge CXN v2 streamer. I wonder if anyone else has this experience.

128x128rvpiano

Showing 3 responses by ghdprentice

The sound from my streamer of red book CDs sound exactly the same as streamed versions. Streaming can sound better, Qobuz frequently has higher resolution files available. Also, my analog end… no slouch… also sounds overall the same as well. See my User ID for systems. We are talking about a vast soundstage ten or more feet deep, with natural fully fleshed out instruments suspended in 3D space, microdynamics, brass sounding like brass, voices with full midrange bloom… from Qobuz.

 

Digital and streaming has been getting better and better over the last couple of decades. First the cost difference (between good analog and good digital) was large to get as good as analog… and the minimum investment was $100K… that dropped… then over the last ten years.. streaming has improved radically…. A lot of people resist the idea that a streamer can matter and stick to PCs. Sorry, your streamer has to be built like any piece of good audio equipment… massive design effort, massive quiet power supply, isolation and weigh over 30 pounds. At this time really carefully chosen streamer (of red book) can equal CD players at most levels of high fi investment. However, like all other aspects, you just can’t buy something, plunk it down and expect to draw any conclusions. You need compatible and synergistic components.

For most aspiring audiophiles today, they should set their sites on streaming as their objective. If they like disks, analog is an relatively easy; a bit less expensive way to get high end sound)… but very restrictive in what you can listen to because of the cost of disks.

A CD player is a physical transport, streamer, and DAC. Buying one that is better than a streamer and a DAC that are not complementary is simple. While buying a good streamer and DAC will set you up for the rest of your life. Buying a great CD player is very nostalgic… hey, I’m 69 years old… that is my excuse… if you are not retired… figure out streaming, Don’t waste your time on antiquated technology.

@sns

 

Thanks. Yes… physically owning a disk… paying and storing these is on the way out. I have 2,000 vinyl albums and 2,000 CDs… takes up space and if you don’t steam, confines you to listen and re-listen repeatedly to the same thing… but for the price of one CD per month, you have access to millions of tunes.

@fuzztone

Us old farts have a lot of history in these antiquated technologies. So, maybe changing direction isn’t worth it to some. But younger folks are wasting money that could be better spent on something that has a future… streaming.

 

I bought a K&E slide rule in 1974. I lusted after this bamboo, high end, incredibly good quality slide rule for years. This was the same year that the first affordable calculator came out, the Texas Instruments SR-50 that made slide rules a completely useless device. If you were going to retire from science in a few months… then just keep using your slide rule, otherwise, invest in something with a future… a calculator. I used the slide rule a few times, I loved to look at it… I still have it… I bought an SR-50… my physics labs that took 12 hours (all calculating) dropped to 1 hour of work… only doing physics… not playing with the slide rule. The world of high-end audio is moving on.

Having owned Aurlic Aries G2, Aurender N100, auditioned an Aurender N10, and now  Aurender W20SE, as well as using PCs, Macs… and other devices, the differences in sound quality among these is huge. Maybe, it doesn’t sound logical, but they are just like other parts of the audio chain.