Ishka, please audition your favorite contra-base/cello recordings through MG 37is. My take is that their line source drivers produce more realistic long string sound than do most cones.
My ears tell me I am hearing nuanced detail I can’t hear from cones. My imagination tells me that linear drivers produce sound waves more like long strings do. My brain tells me that low mass membranes are so fast they can reveal audible vibratory energy pulses that cannot be replicated by cones. I’m thinking that low mass beryllium tweeters probably benefit detail in the high end for the same reason.
Please don’t give more weight than due to the E’s comments. I find that a good blast of high THC yerba improves SQ far more than even the most expensive doped rocks, wood shims or exotic conductors. I guess it must be my doped internal wiring that is the key!?
My ears tell me I am hearing nuanced detail I can’t hear from cones. My imagination tells me that linear drivers produce sound waves more like long strings do. My brain tells me that low mass membranes are so fast they can reveal audible vibratory energy pulses that cannot be replicated by cones. I’m thinking that low mass beryllium tweeters probably benefit detail in the high end for the same reason.
Please don’t give more weight than due to the E’s comments. I find that a good blast of high THC yerba improves SQ far more than even the most expensive doped rocks, wood shims or exotic conductors. I guess it must be my doped internal wiring that is the key!?