Can we finally put Reel to Reel out of its misery? Put it to rest people.


The format is dying and too expensive to repair properly. Heads wear out so easy and many out there are all worn.
High quality technicians are either retired or long gone. Its such an inconvenient format that can be equalled by nakamichi easily in tape decks.
Retire it please put them in museums. 
vinny55

Showing 2 responses by nicktheknife

I had an Akai Reel to Reel deck I bought overseas at a base exchange Rota, Spain in 1981. 

It was a fine piece and sounded fantastic. It even had a plastic dust cover that went over the reels.

I sold it around '93/'94 for what amounts to peanuts.  This was before the internet.

I wish I still had it only because I could sell it for a lot more now.  

I still play my records but that's as far as I will go as far as inconvenience is concerned.  Life's getting too short to be constantly fiddling and not listening.
@ orpheus10

Don’t really see how a R2R is much less trouble than a turntable. Once the table is setup it’s easy. Unless, you are anal and must make adjustments for every record you play.

Pre recorded reel tapes are expensive.

If you record on a R2R it can be very time consuming not to mention a pain if you want to listen to a particular album on a ten inch reel. I remember having a few 10 inch reels full of recorded music but got sick of fast forwarding or backwards to get to a particular album. Then having to take the tape off and putting another on to get to another album.

My deck also had an auto reverse function if you applied a small length of metallic tape at the end of the recorded tape it would reverse. So you could get essentially 6 hrs(?) of music on one 10 in. reel.

No thanks.

I admit that the sound was fantastic though.

Like I said,  I could have sold that rig for a lot more than what I did back in the day.  I hope someone is happy with it.