Cable elevators - conventional wisdom wrong?


Reluctant to put any considerable money in them, the reasons for using cable elevators seemed intuitively correct to me: decouple cables mechanically from vibration and insulate them from the carpet's static. I have therefore built cheap elevators myself using Lego building blocks. (Plastic with a more or less complex internal structure; moreover, there is enormous shaping flexibility, for instance you can also build gates with suspended strings on which to rest the cables)
In their advertisement/report on the Dark Field elevators, Shunyata now claim that conventional elevators are actually (very?) detrimental in that they enable a strong static field to build up between cable and floor causing signal degradation.
Can anyone with more technical knowledge than I have assess how serious the described effect is likely to be? Would there, theoretically, be less distortion with cables lying on the floor? Has anyone actually experienced this?
karelfd

Showing 1 response by aggielaw

FWIW, I constructed a set of cable risers that are cheap versions of the RSAD risers Robert mentions above. I had some frustrating moments but they work great and look nice.

I noted that my system sounded "cleaner" across the audio spectrum with a little better imaging to boot.

The acrylic risers look sexy, but I've noticed acrylic seems to conduct static electricity, so I'd be concerned about using them on carpet. I'm not sure why I've had so many static issues with acrylic considering it's a plastic, but I have.