bryston sp 7.1 or ead 8800 pro?????

I have the EAD 8800pro in the system right this minute comparing it to a Bryston.

Lately I am 70% 2-channel, 25% Movie (Dolby Digital), and 5% DTS:neo6 music.

So far the Bryston/Jolida CDP bypass combo is the superior 2 channel sound (Soundstage, dynamics, and very black). Though the EAD's internal DACs are better than Brystons in 2 channel 44.1khz. Dont misunderstand me though the EAD in bypass is very good. Conclusion--- 2 channel with a decent or better CDP goes to Bryston. 2 channel with built in DACs goes to EAD.

The EAD sounds warmer with Movies. Some soudtracks are better warmer, some are not. Dynamics seem equal. Conclusion--- seems a push to me.

DTS:neo6 music seems more dynamic at lower wolumes with the EAD. But as you get to a mid volume the Bryston seems to open up. The center width control on the Bryston may give it an advantage. I prefer the least signal removed from the left/right. The EAD is a tad warmer here too. The Brystons 5hz increments with sub Xover helps me to better tune bass in my troublesome room. Conclusion--- if you like low volume, then EAD. If you like a little wolume with your multichannel music, well, I say a either one.

The EAD touchscreen remote is the coolest. Thought the solid metal Bryston remote is no slouch.

The full functioning interface on the front of the Processor is a nod to Bryston. My wife to be scoffed at the interface on the EAD.

These are just my very subjective opinions. I suggest auditions before you buy.

Sutts, thanks so much. Even though I am opinionated I try to be fair.

Flemke, I am using 2 of the eight analog inputs on the EAD for the two channel. (I really dont need to try the other 6 because my Jolida CDP resolves better than my Sony SACD). The manual isnt clear on whether it is A to D back to A on the other inputs. It is clear that the bypass inputs are analog only.

Harry, we have disagreed on this very topic before. In retrospect its easy to see why. My needs are different from yours (2 channel vs multi). Toss in different taste and systems it seems evident why you may like the EAD so much.

The bottom line is, this EAD is a really nice piece. Though I am satisfied with my current setup, especially considering the amount of 2 channel I listen to. There are a few things I like about each however. The setup is a snap with the EAD. The EADs face plate is gorgeous. The Bryston gives me the option of using a sub in two channel bypass, plus the Bryston lets me bypass any input, not a select few like the EAD.

Though this whole comparison is rather moot for me. I fully intend to separate HT from 2 channel or at least separate the signal. With that in mind I am even considering downgrading. I have a new house in the works and it will have an 18' by 22' bonus room (above the garage). I am thinking dedicated HT with projector. At the very least I will have a dedicated listening room.