BPT vs. Hydra 8- Your thoughts?


I'm a big fan of the Balanced Power Technologies conditioners and have been quite amazed at the increase in resolution and grunge reduction they provide. So- no complaints.

Having read so many raves regarding the Hydra however, my curiosity has peaked. Hence the question- who among you has experience with both, and what were your impressions?

Thanks for your comments in advance.
danlib1
Post removed 
Tvad, I've found the same using the GFCI outlets. As usual, preferences are all about synergy.
Post removed 
I suppose there's nothing wrong with reporting/describing one's impressions of two (or three or four) different "power treatment" devices; but unless they are all (operationally) the same kind of device, I think making any comparisons between them is inappropriate.

So for instance, saying the "BPT beat out the Hydra" is not a revelation. I'd always expect a balanced power unit to trump a conditioner of reasonably equivalent build quality regardless of brand.
.
I also preferred the BPT 3.5 sig over the Hydra 8. The Hydra sounded a little dark with rolled off highs in my system. On the other hand I do use the Hydra 4 on my digital, none of that darkness. Perhaps the Fesi and copper of the Hydra 8 vs. no Fesi and silver of the Hydra 4? I've also found no current limiting with the BPT
I have owned both the BPT 3.5 Sig and the Hydra 8, and they are great conditioners, but the BPT beat out the Hydra 8 in my system on all counts by a fair margin. Neither gave me any troubles with power limiting with high current amps.