Biggest audio hoaxes


Often when people discuss audio, they talk about "snake oil" or "hoaxes."

It's pretty typical to use the term hoax as a tactic against another who disagrees with one, or holds an unusual opinion or vouches for something which has not been verified. That's not what I mean by a "hoax." 

By "hoax" I mean an audio product or claim which has been pretty definitively disproved. Maybe not to everyone's satisfaction, but to common consensus.

So -- with that definition of hoax in mind, what are some of the biggest audiophile hoaxes you've heard of?
hilde45

Showing 2 responses by bdp24

The design of the Townshend Pod was clearly explained in detail here quite a while ago, several times. I was contacted privately in regard to my postings on them by several members, who also posted about them. All the while the new convert ignored the Townshend products, not to mention the springs offered by Geoff Kait (which are also worthwhile).

Speaking of GK, he and I discussed in public the benefits vs. penalties of employing damping with a spring; the Townshend design includes a form of damping (which I referred to as brilliant), Geoff’s springs don’t. Kait made his case against damping, I defended it. It’s all on the record. Also covered were Max Townshend’s earlier isolation platform, the Seismic Sink. I at one time owned and used eight of them, now having replaced all but three with Pods. The sink uses top and bottom damped metal plates separated by an inner tube (or two, or three, depending on the weight capacity), an idea dating back to the 1950’s (though I learned of it in the mid-80’s from Frank Van Alstine).

I cited the YouTube videos in which Max Townshend explains the design of the Pod, and demonstrates it’s effectiveness in providing isolation, and Geoff went so far as to provide links to the various videos. So the only reason one would not know about---and realize the possible benefits provided by---the Townshend isolation products, is because one chose to ignore them. In one posting I stated I was giving up mentioning them, as people continued to cling to their belief in whatever other means of achieving isolation they preferred, the carbon fiber shelves of BDR (Black Diamond Racing) being a common one. Though the BDR products are great (I own them too), they are not capable of doing what the Townshend Seismic products do. It’s great that more people have had their eyes opened to that fact.

Anyway, if you have yet to try one of the Townshend Seismic products, consider it. Buying the Pods is much cheaper than the platforms which include sets of Pods, so if you already have a nice shelf the Pods are the way to go. Try one set, and see if you hear the benefits. But as with all "systems" (interconnects and speaker cables, power cords and conditioners), the results are maximized if you fit your entire hi-fi with them. Every chain in the link is quite capable of "blocking" low-level information, which may "mask" any improvement wrought further backstream. Max and John recommend starting with the speakers, as their improved sound will make improvements further back in the system more audible.
@noromance and @slaw speak the truth. Though they aren’t the type to loudly take credit for discovering spring isolation, a search for their contributions on that subject will be rewarding. As will a search for postings related to the Townshend Audio Seismic Pod---from a number of people including myself---which were for years ignored by a certain Audiogon member while he continued to loudly proclaiming and insist that the BDR carbon fiber shelves were what advanced audiophiles such as himself used to achieve isolation.

Well, better late than never, right? Every class has it’s slow learner. ;-)
More to discover