I compared the C200 to the C2200 and the C42, the predecessor of the C46. The C200 was the best of all, in all regards. It sounded as tube-like natural as the C2200, but had more authority, more drive, better bass than the C2200 when it came to dynamic pop-music (Eminem)and large orchestral music. The difference was noticable, but small, if you think that the C2200 costs 4500 $, and the C200 7000 $. I bought it because I had the possibility to get a model that was only used for a few months, with a large discount. Another reason to buy the C200 was the excellent, Ortofon-built MC phono section. I just got the bug for vinyl again and will buy a TT after 15 years CD only.
Big Difference Between The C200 & C46 and C2200
Hi,
Mac lovers I need feedback quick. I am thinking of buying a Mac preamp, I don't use LP's anymore, I hear they SS and the Tubes units sound simular with the SS being more dynamic.
Mac told if I don't listen to LP's then the C46 line stage would be as good sounding as the C200 Soliod state unit and the C2200 would as good but a little softer, with a touch less transparent.
Feedback please on your experiences with these units. My local store does not carry them all, in fact they are poorly set up.
Mac lovers I need feedback quick. I am thinking of buying a Mac preamp, I don't use LP's anymore, I hear they SS and the Tubes units sound simular with the SS being more dynamic.
Mac told if I don't listen to LP's then the C46 line stage would be as good sounding as the C200 Soliod state unit and the C2200 would as good but a little softer, with a touch less transparent.
Feedback please on your experiences with these units. My local store does not carry them all, in fact they are poorly set up.