I like low-powered tube amps of all designs--pushpull, SET and OTL--so I am not so wedded to a particular design. As jasonbourne71 stated, it is the particular design and parts used that matter most. In particular, the output transformers and interstate transformers (if used) that matter a lot.
I do have some tube preferences (meaning I've heard a number of good amps made with a particular tube type), but it is not absolute such that I universally prefer something made with that type of tube over others.
Of the three small triodes mentioned, I tend to most like the 45 as long as it is used with suitable speakers. I own a parallel 2a3 amp that I used with 99 db/w efficient speakers and a 45 pushpull amp (both have sufficient power for my purposes, but then again, I don't play the system very loudly. I currently run a pushpull 349 amp (5.5 watts per channel) that I like a lot. I tend to prefer the 45, 2a3, 300b over the larger transmitting-tube SET amps (211, 845) although these can sound very good. For pushpull amps, I also like a number of old and new designs that employ 6L6 and KT66 pentodes. For really exotic tube types, I like the 350B, 349 (pentodes) and the 252 (triode somewhat like a 300b).
For the OP's 96-97 db/w speakers, it might be possible to use the three triodes mentioned (particularly the 300b), as long as the owner is willing to accept some restriction on very high volume listening. I personally feel that some compromise in that area is worth it. For a safer bet on compatibility, something in the 40 watt range should be sufficient.