I like most Blue Note recordings I have heard, FWIW. They tend to be solidly produced and enjoyable even if not knock your socks off audiophile reference recordings in many cases. Its a label I will buy without any prior knowledge of a recording when I come across it at the right price because I expect the recording quality to not be a barrier to musical enjoyment. In some cases, the recordings are in fact top notch. I'll note my copy of Coltrane's "Blue Train" CD on Blue Note as an example of a top notch jazz recording on CD from that era.
I've been shocked of late listening to old Motown CD remasters on my system of late. I used to think those without much merit sonically but now they are a revelation and I have done a 180 of late. YEs, lots of studio mastering in play but the recordings mostly sound pretty good to me these days in a shimmery pop kind of way that manages to suck me in. Nothing like what most would deem an "audiophile" recording, but still nice to listen to if you are into that kind of music at all ( I am minimally I would say).
A lot of my home listening enjoyment these days with my audiophile hat on comes from what most might generally consider to be pretty average or run of the mill recordings perhaps more so than trying to wean some last fraction of a percent of sound quality in the grand scale of things out of what most would consider the best audiophile recordings. Relatively scarce pickings in that turf. When most of what you listen to sounds great whereas in the past it did not, its both an audiophile and music lover's heyday. I wish more audiophiles could manage to get to that promised land.
