Apple lossless is a compression technology, though very good and theoretically lossless. AIFF on the other hand has no compression algorithm at all and renders bit for bit.
I believe that's where the inference that it's somewhat "less" than AIFF or WAV comes into play.
Considering the low cost of storage these days, many would choose to go bit for bit vs. any compression whatsoever, even a good scenario like Apple Lossless.
I believe that's where the inference that it's somewhat "less" than AIFF or WAV comes into play.
Considering the low cost of storage these days, many would choose to go bit for bit vs. any compression whatsoever, even a good scenario like Apple Lossless.