Very interesting - Thanks. I am using the Benz Micro Ebony High Output and think it's a killer.
Benz Micro Empire MC 5
I received my Empire MC5 cartridge yesterday and mounted it on my Moerch up 4 with a red armtube. It´s not broken in yet, but my first impression is, that it´s a real bargain. It reveals more details than the Supex SD 900 that I had mounted before, and it´s fast, airy and has good tracking abilities.
But i´m wondering a bit about the origin of this cartridge. On this website http://www.aaanalog.de/forum/forum-do.htm I found what looks like data material regarding this cartridge.
Here you can read that the recommended tracking force for this cartridge is somewhere between 1.4 and 2 grams. The guy who sold it on ebay claims that it can track as low as .25 grams. Mine is now tracking at .8 grams, and I haven´t got any tracking problems. But i´m a bit confused now about the true origin of the cartridge. Is this the cartridge mentioned in the AAAnalog.de database or is it a completely different cartridge? In the database it´s mentioned that the weight of the cartridge is 6.6 grams. I placed my cartridge on a scale, and mine weighs the same.
As far as I know, the Empire MC-2 and 3 where claimed to be some of the best cartridges of its time. Am I right about that?
And just to make things a bit more confusing, I can find information regarding a Benz Micro MC 3:
http://www.vinylengine.com/phpBB2/album_page.php?pic_id=2004
But I cant find any informaion regarding a cartride called Empire MC 3. And the Benz Micro MC 3 share the same cartridge body as the Van den hul cartridges. My Empire MC 5 has a completely different body. Why should the MC 3 and the MC 5 not have the same cartridge body, if the technical data regarding theese two cartridges are the same?
Why is the body on the mc 5 different than the one on MC 2 and 3 even though they are supposed to have the same technical data? And What has Van den hul got to do with it?
Can anyone help me? It seems to me to be a bit of a puzzle.
But i´m wondering a bit about the origin of this cartridge. On this website http://www.aaanalog.de/forum/forum-do.htm I found what looks like data material regarding this cartridge.
Here you can read that the recommended tracking force for this cartridge is somewhere between 1.4 and 2 grams. The guy who sold it on ebay claims that it can track as low as .25 grams. Mine is now tracking at .8 grams, and I haven´t got any tracking problems. But i´m a bit confused now about the true origin of the cartridge. Is this the cartridge mentioned in the AAAnalog.de database or is it a completely different cartridge? In the database it´s mentioned that the weight of the cartridge is 6.6 grams. I placed my cartridge on a scale, and mine weighs the same.
As far as I know, the Empire MC-2 and 3 where claimed to be some of the best cartridges of its time. Am I right about that?
And just to make things a bit more confusing, I can find information regarding a Benz Micro MC 3:
http://www.vinylengine.com/phpBB2/album_page.php?pic_id=2004
But I cant find any informaion regarding a cartride called Empire MC 3. And the Benz Micro MC 3 share the same cartridge body as the Van den hul cartridges. My Empire MC 5 has a completely different body. Why should the MC 3 and the MC 5 not have the same cartridge body, if the technical data regarding theese two cartridges are the same?
Why is the body on the mc 5 different than the one on MC 2 and 3 even though they are supposed to have the same technical data? And What has Van den hul got to do with it?
Can anyone help me? It seems to me to be a bit of a puzzle.
2 responses Add your response