Belles 22A users yet?


Have any of you listened to this new unit yet and compared it to your 21A Auricap?

Thanks,
Wig
wig

Showing 3 responses by davt

I will add a bit to the above. I have been searching for a replacement for my 21A with auricap preamp for a couple of years. I just feel I should have a better preamp for my system. I am constantly left with a feeling that there is not much to be gained. I am currently demoing a VTL 5.5 series II, very nice pre, but it does not bring a whole lot to the table that the 21A did not bring. Perhaps a bit more in the bottom, and some detail but not as well defined, instrument location is a little more vague with less defined sound stage. I am going to give it some time but as of right not I would be hard pressed to part with my 21A and a handfull of cash for the 5.5 II. I did demo the VTL 6.5 and really like that, very detailed, great sound stage, super bass, better all around. Only problem was the $11.5k entry fee. Be careful before parting with a 21A. PS I am sure a good audio tech could put in the Auricap capacitors on older models, it would just be some money, they are not cheap. I also upgraded tubes and did not skimp, NOS RCA 5814 from vintage tubes. I also noted significant improvement with stillpoints. (the new VT-01 comes with integral stillpoint feet)
I actually had a VT-01 in the house along with the new phono stage that has not yet been produced for market. I did like the VT-01 but did not find it greatly different from the 21A, though it had stock tubes and power cord. I think the case work in much nicer on the VT-01 and would consider it an upgrade, but not a huge one. I am wondering now about the LA-01 though am a little shy of stepping away from tubes for a pre-amp. I am also going to give the 5.5 II another try as I don't think the one I have is working as it should.
I did get a chance to audition a VTL 5.5 series II for a week and it was much better. There was a small wiring error in my first one and VTL was very quick to address the issue. The VTL series II as a whole was better than my 21A. The VTL had more information at the extremes, bass was deeper and tighter, the highs were more detailed with more air and my system conveyed more of the music. That being said, my 21A is quieter, the midrange is lacking of nothing and perhaps a little more warm and relaxing, very nice to listen to. If I could choose between the two on a whole I would pick the VTL 5.5 series II, BUT the VTL is $6000 and the Belles half that when new and the diffence is small. I could easily live with the Belles and be happy ever after. So am I going to live with the Belles? I don't know, I am going to try a Herron VTSP-3A as that might be the ticket. I am also going to further consider the VTL with phono as it is a very good amp and I have a hole being burnt into my pocket. But I will not give up the Belles easily. PS mine is the Auricap and I strongly recommend this upgrade as well as a set of still points and a little tube rolling.