Bass, more or less?


Let me first say that I have a pair of Sonus Faber Guarneri that I have owned for several years now. I am driving them with a Mcintosh 2102 (100 watts per side). I recently read an interview with Sonus faber founder Franco Serblin in wich he made an interesting statement. He said "The search for perfect bass is futile, because if you want more you miss it and when you have it it disturbs you". Based on my experience I would say that statement is true, years later I have found my Guarneri still satisfy me. True when I listen to other speakers some may have more bass or more of "Something" else. But in the end it's the total sound package and signature that a speaker produces that will keep you happy. For me the closer a speaker comes to ideal midrange the less tiresome it is to listen to over time. Speakers that have a more extended bass response are somehow more frusterating to listen to. Just my thoughts.......
nocaster

Showing 1 response by hens

Interesting thread, Nocaster. My experience is largely similar to your own. I have tended to own speakers (Quad 57's, Ruark Talisman II's, Rogers Studio 1a, Mordaunt-Short P6's) which do the mids right rather than fully extending to the lowest octaves. With any of these speakers, they do so much right in the critical mid range and lower treble that I seldom feel I'm missing out on the low lows.

Having said that, I've had the opportunity to listen to a few systems with genuine full range speakers (MBL 101's, Avalon Isis, Rockport, Von Schweikert, and a few others) and they have definitely had an additional dimension that my own speakers have lacked and this was no doubt bass related. The common element in all these systems, however, was a significantly larger room than mine and significantly more expensive (and powerful) amplification.

If I win the lottery and suddenly find myself in a listening room double the size, my priorities would certainly shift to seeking a more full range loudspeaker.