Nice write up.
It hurts me to be the one to tell you, @ghdprentice, but user @tokushi is AI. It's pretty obvious.
Balanced XLR vs RCA for phono stage
My new BAT VK 3500 has balanced inputs, and my Goldnote PS-10 has 1 balanced output, rated at +12dB.
I have no clue what the pros and cons are for balanced XLR vs. single ended RCA, other than XLR is preferred for long runs.
I’m currently using a 1.5m Zavfino Fusion RCA cable. Is there any benefit in getting the exact same cable terminated with XLR?
Thanks!
It hurts me to be the one to tell you, @ghdprentice, but user @tokushi is AI. It's pretty obvious. |
Good for you for ignoring the naysayers and finding out for yourself. I've found components that are truly balanced usually sound best when connected in a balanced configuration for the same reasons you note. |
With all due respect to Ralph, I am going to quibble with this definition. There's more than one way to design a balanced circuit and operational amplifiers have long been used to generate both halves of the signal. There are advantages to the AES48 standard, but I don't think it's accurate to say that only amplifiers meeting the standard are "truly balanced." By way of example, most (if not all) ARC amplifiers are differentially balanced yet don't comply with AES48. To claim that all ARC did to achieve balanced outputs is "add a 2nd output ... out of phase with the first" really doesn't accurately describe the amplifier's circuit. |
Many components that are differentially balanced yield 6 dB more gain in balanced configuration; or, you could see that as gaining 6 dB in s/n. So depending on the equipment, there can be very much to gain by using XLR connections. |