Balanced vs RCA preamps


How important is it that your Pre-amp has both balanced and RCA capabilities? I’m shopping for another pre, most likely tube, and it seems to make sense with any future component that it offers both XLR and RCA. And to further complicate the search finding both these features plus remote limits the offerings for both tube and SS particularly tube.

 

kckrs

Showing 3 responses by westcoastaudiophile

Balanced interface is superior to single ended, not matched impedance RCA (or DIN) one, because:

1) truly balanced (not pseudo) interface has common mode noise rejection, which eliminates / reduces noise between two connected devices chassis / gnds, RCA (or unbalanced DIN), transfer all noise to the signal. 

2) balanced interface, originally designed for 600 Ohm driver / receiver impedance match, eliminates problem of time delayed signal reflections from original signal, thus enables long cables w/o tangible signal quality loss).

3) balancing in RCA or other single ended interconnects can be achieved by adding isolating / balancing transformers, but good performing transformer is costly. 

@68pete "Just because you have balanced input and out puts does not mean the unit is full balanced!” +1

XLR isn’t only balancing solution possible! I designed “balanced interconnect” by adding out and in fully isolating ground transformers, typ 50Ohm unbal. <=> 600Ohm bal. systems with RCA/DIN unbalanced outs and ins with excellent results!