2. amps-preamps
  3. 177204-110235

Balanced versus single ended

From my experience, every situation that had both options, the balanced connection and/or increased gain sounded better, regardless of the bolume knob’s final position. More detail , air, emotional connection etc. The single ended cables used were good, not the bargain or so called high end extreme.

Sometimes using balanced or xlr it involved just the source, but optimally it carried through thd entire chain.

Anyways, my question is: has anyone ever thought that single ended sounded better?given the 2 options. Im only referring to a truly balanced connection.

I ask, because a manufacturer who makes tube amps, recommends single over balanced connection. Is there something else involved in this decision, additional parts or labor complexity? Is the signal path extended?

Thanks in advance

 

recluse

Showing 1 response by sns

sns
3,003 posts
 

I can only say my present setup, balanced from digital source through real balanced pre, finally through monoblock amps, which are also in effect, true full balanced I get best sq.

 

I've also had any number of se components over the years. Certainly, I have higher resolution than systems or components that contained se. Still, without having the choice on most or present components to directly compare hard to say. Balanced does have advantage of lower noise floor, and components that are truly balanced have inherent advantages as well. Not sharing power supplies, output transformers in case of tube components, signal path circuit is only good.

 

In case where component is not truly balanced, I can imagine se being better, in this case balanced is add on, using transformer or some other scheme for xlr.

More to discover