B W 802N versus 801M

Step up in cost not necessary in sound quality. Money would be better spent by upgrading your cross over. Try NorthCreek and you'll be getting closer to your 801 S3 potential. Put side by side a 801 S3 with better crossover against 802N, you'll be surprised.

Thanks for the response. I have the 801II upgraded to III AND THE NORTHCREEK external crossovers. I have a chance to go to the 802 Nautilus. Was wondering what I will find better about the difference?

What is your experience?

I also have 801's with the North Creek x-o's and I regularly listen to N-802's. I still prefer the deep bass response in the 801M, but the new Nautilus "head" does reveal more depth and detail. The North Creeks elevate the "old" Matrix series to a level of resolution close to Nautilus, so spend the money on upgrading any weaker links in your system before you consider the investment. Also, be sure you're happy with the different type of bass response.

I also have 801 III w/North Creeks and auditioned the 801N and 802N. I still prefer the Matrix in that I think they are more "lively" and have the "snap" I seem to loose with the Nautilus. I think the Nautilus are more controled for sure, but maybe not for their own good. This would definately depend on your system and your expectations of it. If you have to have the Nautilus go for it, but if it isn't broke don't fix it.
I was always wanting to know what the Krell bass alignment filters would do for the matrix?

Thanks for the response. I am running the Cal amp, a McIntosh MX-132 preamp and the McIntosh DVD. I notice the M801's need more power than I have, odd, but true.

So as I expect, I lose a bit on the bottom end, but gain in the clarity of the mid/high frequency of the Nautilus line.
I love the M801's, but was hoping for a bit cleaner sound at HIGH levels.

Worthy?