"audiophiles listen to their equipment"


That quote is misattributed to Alan Parsons, as I understand. Anyway saying there's a problem with wanting good sound is like saying an instrument designer, aiming for beautiful sound, could not possibly be a music lover and is only interested in the sound of the instruments. I.e. the sound is inseparable from the music. For me the beauty of the sound, good microdynamics, and so on, are the "doors" to the meaning of the music.

magon

Showing 4 responses by stuartk

I’d suggest there’s a spectrum. Those of us who play are more inclined to think of music in terms of its formal elements: melody, harmony, rhythm, etc. Of course we love beautiful sounds but that is not the essence. For us, say, the psychoacoustical experience of a tri-tone interval has little to do with sonics. On the other hand, those who do not play but grew up with a parent or friend who was an audiophile and whose initial exposure and process of falling in love with music (or however you prefer to describe it) was inextricably linked to refined sonics will understandably tend to define music more in terms of sonics. There are those who possess an engineering mindset for whom music happens to be the particular arena in which they choose to utilize their inventiveness. They may tend to regard music more in terms of a challenge to their technical expertise/creativity. Three possible points along a spectrum.

 

@brianlucey 

... and working musicians (as opposed to millionaire Rock/Pop stars) are infamous for not owning high-end audio systems or caring about home audio sonics. 

FYI, I’ve played guitar for over 50 years. 

Tonality is my top priority when it comes to audio. 

for the audiophiles their equipment is the instrument…

 

With all due respect, as a creative person, I don’t agree with this assertion.

 

Changing the gear overtime is their contribution to the process of creativity, no different than musicians, changing their instrument or gear chain

I don’t understand what you mean by "contribute to the process of creativity". 

Do you mean changing gear is essentially a creative process?

Do you mean when audiophiles change gear, they are contributing to the artist’s creative process? 

Or something else? 

 

 

@brianlucey 

No; you are not hearing me and neither am I able to follow your train of thought.

When did this turn into a cable thread?

Why are you making assumptions about my system or my need to apply intention and effort?

We are clearly on different wavelengths, here. 

No big deal.  

Happy listening! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@unreceivedogma 

If the system is incapable of reproducing it, then you are correct: there will be none to be heard. 

 

You've misunderstood me but your condescending tone doesn't incline me to try to explain.