To fully understand your question we must read about the relation between a room soundfield translating a recorded "wall of sound" for example in our speakers/room for our ears...
This acoustic translation will be improved if we take advantage of our TWO ears and TWO speakers in a specific acoustic way...This is acoustic passive treatment and mechanical acoustic control of a room...
Timbre perception, imaging, dynamic, listener envelopment/sound source width ratio, soundstage are all acoustic cues which are captured in some specific way for each recording and which ask to be translated by our 2 speakers in a specific room acoustic content for our different two " ears "...
A live concert CANNOT be reproduced identically, the recording process is a trade-off set of choices already, and your own speakers/room/ears is another set of trade-off choices...
A live recorded concert can be TRANSLATED in your room /speakers/ ears acoustic language...No identical reproduction is possible because already BEFORE the recording microphones placement, each listener at this concert will perceive the same concert differently...
And by the way in a controlled room acoustically speaking the sound is not CONFINED to the plane between the speakers when played back from many recording translation choices by the recording engineer... In an uncontrolled room the soundfield is often captive between most speakers all the time...
I know we have two ears but when I went to a live concert recently the sound was coming from that one musician, not from the left or right 10-15 feet apart like speakers are placed. Why do we need two speakers if the goal is to make them sound like they are coming from one source?