Interesting topic, I personally don't care for the format of AA hence I have never posted there, it seems unorganized to me. If reviewers don't feel its worth their time- fine with me! I have noticed the few times I wandered over that things were a little too hokey for my palette(not that we are perfect at audiogon, but just my preference here) and the name calling and uncivil conduct just isn't my cup of tea- that's why we are allowed to do what we want when we want to thus the two different sites with there own fans. I have a funny feeling I know where I am staying Happy listening everyone ~Tim
Audiogon/Asylum and magazine reviewers posts
For whatever reason(s), I have always prefered Audiogon over the Asylum; a few weeks ago there was this post on the Asylum, "Is Stereophile Abstaining From AA ?". Many on here may already know that several reviewers do participate on AudioAsylum. I posted this question to that post, "My question is, why don't they frequent Audiogon as well? Any response JA?" I received the following reply from the reviewer Kal Rubison, "I monitor Audiogon but there's rarely anything worth commenting on."
This post isn't anything against Kal, I was just curious if others that frequent both sites find that AA has more meaningful posts?
This post isn't anything against Kal, I was just curious if others that frequent both sites find that AA has more meaningful posts?