Audio Research Reference 6 or Mark Levinson Reference n32


Hi all, 
I own a ML Ref n32 preamp with the phonostage. I am very tempted to buy the audio research reference 6, replacing ML 32, but I'm afraid to regret the splendid performance of the ML 32.

Did any of you have a chance to compare? What advice do you feel to give me?
I listen only vinyl and if I'll buy the ARC Ref6 I'll need a pre phono..

128x128haine

I own a 32 preamp too.  It is currently on loan to a friend.  I now use a tube linestage and separate phono stage, but, the linestage is a custom-built job so it cannot really be compared to anything.  The other linestage that I own is a Emotive Audio Epifania, which is also fairly exotic.  Both tube linestages are more "vivid" sounding and deliver a more enveloping soundstage, but, neither have the incredible flexibility and convenience of the Levinson.  The Levinson sounds good--very smooth and poised-- but, it is a little on the dark and dull side. 


You might like a high end tube linestage, but, if I were you, I would look at a lot of different alternatives.  There is a much wider variety of sounds with tube gear than with most solid state stuff; including tube gear that sounds leaner and meaner and rougher than top solid state stuff (don't fall for the tube-gear-is-warm-and-euphonic line, it can be just the opposite).

What amplifier are you using?  Also, by any chance would the preamp have to drive a subwoofer in addition to the amp?

Regards,
-- Al
 
Today I am comparing the ML with its internal phono stage and the Audio Research Reference 6 with the Aesthetix Rhea phono stage. My cartridge is the Soundsmith PAUA MKII and the turntable is a Brinkmann Balance with its 12.1" tonearm.The power amp is a Dan D’agostino Classic Stereo.
My first impressions compared to the two setups:
I find the ML32 quieter, “educated", calm and linear and more transparent.The ML32 has more detail and has a slightly highlighted mid-high compared to Ref6. ML 32 has a larger extension at the bottom, ensuring greater control.
The Ref6 + Aesthetix Rhea combo returns a bigger soundstage both in height and in width, sometimes it seems to magnify/enlarges the instruments. It has more "physicality" and the sound seems to be less "trapped" in the speakers.

I hope I have explained well..
"Educated" is an excellent way of describing the ML sound.  I've owned tubed pre's and do not miss them after getting my ML 326S.

Have you made a decision yet?
Thank you for your opinion. Which tube pre amp did you have before the ML?

I will take some more time before making a decision ;-)