Audio Research Reference 6 or Mark Levinson Reference n32

Thank you roberjerman for your opinion.
The ML 32 its a very neutral preamp, detailed and refined.
I do not think it will be easy to replace it, but the ARC REF 6 had caught my attention.. :-)

Today I am comparing the ML with its internal phono stage and the Audio Research Reference 6 with the Aesthetix Rhea phono stage. My cartridge is the Soundsmith PAUA MKII and the turntable is a Brinkmann Balance with its 12.1" tonearm.The power amp is a Dan D’agostino Classic Stereo.
My first impressions compared to the two setups:
I find the ML32 quieter, “educated", calm and linear and more transparent.The ML32 has more detail and has a slightly highlighted mid-high compared to Ref6. ML 32 has a larger extension at the bottom, ensuring greater control.
The Ref6 + Aesthetix Rhea combo returns a bigger soundstage both in height and in width, sometimes it seems to magnify/enlarges the instruments. It has more "physicality" and the sound seems to be less "trapped" in the speakers.

I hope I have explained well..

Thank you for your opinion. Which tube pre amp did you have before the ML?

I will take some more time before making a decision ;-)