Are you buying the right interconnects ?

He wasn't a reviewer for Stereophile when he cut that cable apart....

many people have cut cables apart, btw...

re the idea of matched impedance ...device to device as done by the cable, this can be handled differently:

In a fluid metal as a conductive pathway... the connectivity is like an arc strike and is a dynamic flow matching system.

In a wire, this cannot happen. But with a room temperature fluid alloy (fluid at the molecular level, like water) --- it does.

It is not a perfect system, but it is notably better than 'wire'. This is just the straight up physics of it.

wire does that, for the most part.

with the fluid, not so much.

Read up on the conductivity of conductive molecular level fluids.

You might get somewhere. You might be reading for a while, though.....

An interesting point is that even Wikipedia tells you that it falls under the umbrella of QED.

Interestingly enough, that is a recent change in the understanding of the physics of it. It is still evolving.

But wait..there’s more. And more.....

I can’t really respond to confrontational hack jabs like that above post, as there is no good answer to angry when it is set in stone.

To put the shoe on the other foot, tell me why wire is better? Or that somehow wire is perfect as conductors go? where and how does wire ’fall down’?

all of that at the molecular level, please, in layman’s terms.

One had better be up on conductivity at the molecular level, and what is in the texts is pretty darned primitive ( decades old in most cases) compared to what is understood at the leading edges of it...

And if lets say, I did understand it quite well, could it even be translated to commonspeak, at all? And, in such a case, is there any one on the other end of the line.... that is ready to ’get it’?

Do I explain is successfully to one in a crowd of 100 and get stabbed to death as a charlatan by the other 99?

And, when I do that, how many patents do I throw away to those who are silently listening and have the intellectual chops to see it for what it is? Do I end up like Oliver Lodge and get cheated out of a fortune?

I’m telling people it is there, and that it is real and it is superior in some important, fundamental ways. For sane, thinking people... that is more than enough.

I hope by confrontation hack jobs you don’t mean my post

No, not at all....

"The Slurry with the Birefringence on Top" LOL!!!

We'd have to use the full patent for that. Read the patent.

Mechanical tuning of systems (any component thereof) does not have to cost money. 

But careful selection of materials and material attributes is suggested.