are all sacd players the same?


A little technical help for the unenlightened please. I f i want to add another sacd player(i have quite a few discs) does the actual quality of the player matter as much as the ability to play the format? I know that a cd dac at 1000$ is going to be pretty different than a Berkeley or similar at 5k. the question is whether those types of rules hold true on the format change. (Is an oppo sacd going to sound significantly worse than an ayre, for example, at 6k.) thanks mike
emster

Showing 1 response by zd542

The same rules that apply to any other component apply here, as well. Rlwainwright brings up in his post, the thing that is most overlooked with digital products; the analog section. The digital section matters, as well. I just say, consider the whole player and not just parts of it.

You mention the Ayre. My opinion is that its worth the money. Its a big step up from the Oppo. (I'm not suggesting that there is anything wrong with the Oppo. Its a great product for the money.) The one thing I really like about the Ayre is that it sounds great with ALL formats. That's very rare. You don't have to give up having a great Redbook player just to get SACD. (Or buy a 2nd unit).

My only concern would be, do your other components justify the purchase? If your other components are not in the same league as the Ayre, you probably be able to hear everything it can do.