2. digital
  3. 1393650200

ARC Ref CD-8 compared to CD-6 and/or Ref CD-9

Looking for comments from members who might have compared the ARC Ref CD-8 to the newly minted CD-6 and/or Ref CD-9, principally focusing on the redbook CDP function.

Based on a conversation with ARC, I understand that the redbook CD playback circuitry in the 3 models is similar, but not exact. Principal differences are upgraded coupling caps and the DAC configuration.

The Ref CD-8 used Burr Brown PCM 1792 chips configured in stereo mode. By contrast, the CD-6 and Ref CD-9 use the BB PCM 1792A, but configured in quad mono mode.

Also, the CD-6 and Ref CD-9 upsample and have fast/slow filter options. The Ref CD-8 does not offer these options.

Obviously, techno-babble aside, what counts most is how the CDPs sound. ARC says the CD-6 and Ref CD-9 have better dynamics and bandwidth, and lower distortion than the Ref CD-8. Not surprisingly, the new issues sound better.

So ... has anyone had a chance to road test the new players. Even better, compare them to the Ref CD-8. If they newest offerings are markedly better, maybe I should put on the bucket list. Oh ... mainly interested in the redbook functionality.

Thanks

BIF
bifwynne

Showing 1 response by peppar1

peppar1
20 posts
 
Definitely the red book cd is GREAT given the recording engineers did their job as they‘re supposed to.

Just as oregonpapa stated …it’s not always the player itself which has to be replaced as a unit versus a „newer“ (and according to marketing of course „better version“). Oftentimes you get the last „missing“ improvements by doing relatively inexpensive tweak like e.g. changing the cheap standard fuse or finding cables with better synergy in your system. In my case after swapping the fuses in my cdp and my preamp I simply changed positions of my two different XLR interconnects (Stealth Indra & Transparent Reference XL) within my chain…. The improvement in sound was unbelievable and mind-blowing …due to improved synergy…and didn’t cost me a penny!
More to discover